<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fatbiker.co.uk &#187; Honda CB1000r</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatbiker.co.uk/tag/honda-cb1000r/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatbiker.co.uk</link>
	<description>Welcome to Fatbiker.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Honda CB1000r short road test</title>
		<link>http://www.fatbiker.co.uk/2008/09/30/honda-cb1000r-short-road-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fatbiker.co.uk/2008/09/30/honda-cb1000r-short-road-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fatbiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda CB1000r]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatbiker.co.uk/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fatbiker rides the Honda CB1000r. Not everyones cup of tea :-(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took Honda&#8217;s CB1000r out for a spin today courtesy of Marshalls Honda in Peterborough. I had high expectations for this bike having read lots about it in the bike magazines over the past months. Having ridden it I can definitely say that I&#8217;m obviously a twin man and not a 4&#8230; Know what I mean? The 4 cylinder engine found in Japanese bikes really goes when revved hard at the top end but in real world riding on busy roads I found it to be lacking in pure grunt. Even my tractor of a 1 lire Buell had more oomph where it was needed.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;g get me wrong here. The CB is a great looking bike that goes like the clappers when provoked but it&#8217;s not the animal I was expecting. I had a close look at the build quality too and I suspect that the bolt heads will start corroding pretty quickly. They appeared to be made of a cheaper quality metal.</p>
<p>Balance wise the bike is good. The centre of gravity is low so slow speed control in traffic is good as long as you don&#8217;t touch the snatchy front brake too much.</p>
<p>One strange thing I did note whilst out on the road test was the amount of noise coming off the tyres. They were really noisy for a set of tyres that are the same size as the ones fitted to my Buell. So all I can say to Honda is &#8220;you can keep it&#8221; Im obviously a torque monster and dont like/need top end grunt that 4 cylinder engines offer. Oh and the exhaust note was terrible. It whined like a crying baby&#8230;.</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3257/2901376777_deef07034a_o.jpg"><img title="Honda CB1000r" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3257/2901376777_29bf62b40a_m.jpg" alt="Buy it if you wanna go fast. Dont buy it if you want torque" width="240" height="180" /></a><br />
<p class="wp-caption-text">Buy it if you wanna go fast. Dont buy it if you want low down torque.</p></div>
<p> </p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3197/2901403933_62404bd46d_o.jpg"><img title="4 cylinders?" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3197/2901403933_7cc3ed28be_m.jpg" alt="2 are better than 4." width="240" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2 are better than 4.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fatbiker.co.uk/2008/09/30/honda-cb1000r-short-road-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

